Certainly there are at least two schools of thought on golf and technology.
When you make radical changes to a game that is steep in tradition, you are bound to have a lot of controversy…
From my viewpoint I see golf in three ages…
The hickory age
The steel/ persimmon age
The Titanium age
The hickory age, your average expert would drive about 200-220
Steel shafts put that same player out 240-260
Now 280 plus.
I wonder if baseball went to grapefruit over-sized titanium bats, and a hotter ball… how would that effect the game? They could make bigger ball parks I suppose, and of course pitchers would be wearing protective gear too…
I see chess and golf as games of strategy and skill… the different pieces are like different clubs in the bag, in that they have different powers… would chess be more exciting and enjoyable if the pawns were given new powers? could move two spaces instead of one and also have full diagonal domain? Maybe the king could move like a queen?
If these changes were made in these sports or games, would that give more enjoyment to the player and or the fans as well?
There have always been long drive contests, and I agree that they do make a hit with fans, when I was playing the Canadian Tour in the late 80’s a fellow named Kelly Murray used to have long drive clinics each week, and he would be doing all kinds of things like hitting balls off the top of the CN Tower in Toronto or over some gorge or river… people loved it… but they would still come out to watch the tournament too.
even when Kelly would miss the cut…
I don’t see a problem with putting a clock on golfers or chess players…
speed of play has been a problem for decades… If I were king I would make a few rules changes to the game for sure, with regard to lost balls, and provisionals…
Question?
Are they still using wooden Cricket bats? is the ball hotter now?
how has that effected things?
If baseball went the high tech route in MLB, would fans really like to see shortstops hitting 100 homers a year?
If they made the bat 3 times as thick, easier to hit…? would that be good?
We could eliminate 3 putts in golf by making the hole 5 times a big.
We’d see a lot more golfer’s in the 70’s for sure, and tour pros would routinely be in the 50’s … Is that good for the game? it’s traditions?
maybe, why not?
I’m just putting these questions out there…
I think most believed golf was a game of tradition once everyone got used to steel shafts and the 250 yard drive in the 1930’s… it really didn’t change much for the next 50 years… nothing major really…
Golf is a different game now, and the cat is too far out of the bag for things to go back…
Is Tiger the best ever? I have no idea… not even a clue…
If he was playing persimmon with similar gear and shooting 20 under at Augusta with blade irons similar to those of golfs past… If Augusta was still only 6800 as it used to be with no rough … we could draw some safer conclusions…