This article makes a good case for Walter Hagen and how the “majors” evolved…
By WALTER BINGHAM
August 09, 2010
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury: I speak to you today at the behest of my client, Walter Charles Hagen, who though dead for 40 years, has managed to communicate with me.
The PGA Tour record book lists him as third in major championship wins with 11, seven behind Jack William Nicklaus and three shy of Eldrick “Tiger” Woods. It is my intention here to argue that a great injustice has been done to my client, one that I am certain you will agree with when I present the facts.
Mr. Nicklaus, during a career that spanned 25 seasons, won six Masters, five PGA Championships, four United States Opens and three British Opens, 18 in all.
Mr. Woods, still active, has won 14, four behind Nicklaus. He has won four Masters, four PGA Championships, three United States Opens and three British Opens.
I will now list my client’s accomplishments and I urge you to play close attention.
Mr. Hagen won five PGA Championships, four British Opens and two United States Opens for his 11. Did you notice the discrepancy between my client’s record and the other two?
Mr. Hagen has no Masters victories on his scorecard and for good reason. During his prime, which is to say 1914, when he won his first U.S. Open, to 1927, when he won his last PGA Championship, there was no Masters for him to win. The first tournament was held in 1934. Hagen did participate, but he was 42 and well past his prime.
Until the dawn of the Masters, the Western Open, which began in 1899, was considered the third most important golf tournament in this country after the Open and PGA. Hagen won five Western Opens, his first in 1916, his fifth in 1932.
But in those days, major championships bore no special designation. When Ben Hogan, for instance, won his fourth U.S. Open in 1953, it was identified merely as his fourth Open, not his eighth major.
As has been widely reported, including here, if there was a day when four tournaments were pinpointed as majors, it was when Arnold Palmer was flying to Great Britain with his Pittsburgh sportswriter friend Bob Drum. Palmer had just won the U.S. Open and, two months earlier, the Masters.
Now Palmer theorized that if he could win the British Open (where he finished second) and the PGA (which he never won), it would constitute a modern Grand Slam.
Four big tournaments, and what better than the two Arnold had already won that year, plus the British Open and the PGA. The Western Open was left in the gutter.
So you see, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, Walter Hagen’s five Western Open wins suddenly became steerage class, replaced by the Masters, 35 years younger.
I ask you, is that fair? Of course it isn’t.
In other sports, seasons expand, as do playoffs before the World Series or Super Bowl. Excited young sportscasters report that run-of-the-mill outfielders or running backs have just broken Mickey Mantle’s home run record or Jim Brown’s number of touchdowns, ignoring the fact that all those extra games are the reason.
What to do about it?
Well, we could add Mr. Hagen’s five Western Opens before the Masters began to his list of majors, giving him 16 major championships, two ahead of Mr. Woods, two behind Mr. Nicklaus.
But better yet, let’s ignore the Masters, which began too late for Hagen. In counting up majors, let’s consider only the other three, all begun in the 19th century. Sorry, Mr. Nicklaus, but instead of 18 you now have 12. And Mr. Woods, you have 10. My client, Walter Charles Hagen, now becomes second in line with his 11.
And from now on, members of the jury, I suggest that the player who wins the Masters get only a handsome check, a green jacket and the right to name next year’s menu for the Champion’s dinner.