If you look at this video by Paul Wilson he is demonstrating a full-roll hand release action through impact . You can see that through impact from a face-on view that the clubshaft is almost immediately bypassing his left arm from a ‘rotational perspective’ (where his left ‘arm/forearm’ are rotating through impact with a flat left wrist).
GOLF WRIST RELEASE DRILL FOR MORE CLUBHEAD SPEED - YouTube
This is not a drive-hold release and the ‘Rate of Closure’ of the grip and clubface would be large just ‘before/during/immediately after’ impact. The clubface is closing very fast relative to the clubhead path.
Now look at this Athletic Motion Golf video
Golf Swing Timing: Pros vs Ams - YouTube
Unless I’m mistaken, the Pro is actually a ‘Drive-Holder’ where the clubface has remained square to the clubhead path for several inches post impact ( from a face-on view) and the clubshaft will not have bypassed the lead arm from a rotational perspective (unlike what Paul Wilson is promoting).
Also check the ‘Amateur’ hand release action which looks like a flip with a bent left wrist where (from a face-on view) the clubshaft would also have bypassed the left arm (but not solely from a rotational perspective). Obviously , golfers can do a flip-roll at the same time which would make the 'Rate Of Closure ’ of the clubface even higher.
As I’ve mentioned in a previous post on another thread , current research measurements haven’t found any correlation between ‘Rate Of Closure’ and dispersion of the golf ball but there are questions regardiing how dispersion is measured and why they didn’t check for correlations between grip strength. For example, one might suspect that golfers with a strong grip wouldn’t need to rotate the clubface as much as a golfer with a weak/neutral grip . So woud less rotation of clubface affect the rate of clubface closure? More research is required.