The only headlines I saw about the PGA where “Tiger misses Cut” or “Tiger hits new Low”
Never saw anything about the golfers who where playing well.
As much as the guys on tour may resent “It’s all about Tiger”… I hope they realize that the reason they are playing
for the money they do is because of Tiger. Had Tiger not come along… they would still be playing for 1 to 2 million a week tops. (yes total purse)
When I was playing in Australia purses were 100K to 500K (A) a week. In Canada 100K to 150K a week.
In Hogan, Snead era 10K a week.
What we will see in golf moving forward is unknown. But I would predict an ever changing list of major winners getting on the Ferris Wheel. This is because the game and gear has become so homogenized that it is becoming harder and harder for the better players to stand out from the pack. The gear is too easy to hit, so it brings in all the guys who can’t hit it all that well… and the superior ball strikers don’t strike it as well because they are not getting the cranial feedback to keep them as sharp as they need to be. There is no reward for accuracy off the tee since the tour has removed real rough even from majors (exluding The Canadian Open) so a precision ball striker driving from the tee never pops out from the pack as they should.
So tee to green, the game is mostly a wash… and it then becomes an up and down and a putting contest… more likely to see a revolving door effect setting the game up this way than when golf was more of a ballstrikers game played on more variable conditions tee to green with equipment that required proper skills to execute.
Tiger will be back at some point… but I don’t think he will dominate the game like he once did. As much as the tour would like to have a new crown prince… ultimately that will only happen by a player dominating, and they are certainly trying their best to shoot their own feet in that regard.
I didn’t even feel the motivation to watch this weeks “major”
Still not sure why 3 of the 4 world majors are on US soil. I’ve always thought the Australian Open should be the 4th major.
It certainly had the list of proper international champions through the end of the persimmon age. If the guys bitch about it being too far away then I guess they won’t win the event.
Tennis players make the journey.
Each major should subject the players to a different skill set. Obviously The Masters “used to”… and the US Open “used to”
and it is only the “British Open” that actually tests any kind of diversity of real shotmaking anymore. So we really only have two majors in my mind… the British and Canadian Open. The PGA Championship offers nothing unique to the palate since it left the match play format. At best it’s a watered down US Open…often interchanging courses with the US Open. I hope the Canadians don’t cave in next year from pressure to “conform” as 4 under won the tournament. You didn’t see anyone shooting 63 up there with real rough growing even considering they did cave and cut it down after Friday’s round.
The US Open’s excuse for the rough not growing because it was too hot… is complete crap. Never was a problem 100 years ago on the east coast in early summer. I will bet my life you could find an un kept field near the golf course with 20 inch weeds growing.
8 under par was a US Open record that stood for decades … now it’s just a common score… and it’s certainly not because the player are better.