As this year heads to a close I feel like I’ve had a wicked journey through golf this year. And a great deal of it involved golf gear. I guess at this point as the season winds down here, I’d like to share what I went through (as a high handicapper-down to a ‘respectable’ ball striker) and where I’m going next year…
Before I met Lag I thought I would never touch a blade. I listened to many of the so-called modern opinions telling me a non-scratch golfer should never touch a blade. Late last year Lag gave me links to Hogan blades. I told him I thought it was a crazy idea, but I found an '84 PC set for cheap. I loved them. I then went on to find an identical set of '84 Hogan PC blade heads, had them reshafted with S300 SL’s (a little lighter for my wrist) and new grips. I used these for 4-5 months and took NON-STOP guff from playing partners, regular threesomes, and even some light competitive play. It’s hard to ignore all of that. I even had a scratch player I just met this year look me dead in the face and say, ‘Even I would never play those.’
Fast forward a few months: I then went through a rough time over hooking the ball like crazy (for a few different reasons I won’t go in to.) Believing I needed as much ‘help’ as possible, I purchased a smaller cast head with a fair sized sole and perimeter weighting. In the long term this was a mistake. Interestingly enough I admit, there IS additional forgiveness, but I now consider this a bit of a deal with the devil. I started to lose my ability to hit the very middle of the club. It’s not like I always hit it anyway, but the point is blades DO give you that feedback… even a half inch off (high/low/hosel/toe) hit IS given back to you in the form of feedback.
So I have come back to my blades. I have a very rare set of Mizuno blades. They are modern but they are bloody heavy for me, and I believe I’ll always be fighting a wrist issue and this concerns me. I want to go as heavy as possible without hurting myself.
I started looking into the Maltby Playability Factor. Anyone hear of this? Basically Ralph Maltby takes a club head and weights it. He gets a ‘playability’ factor derived from the measurements of the head. This includes (but is not limited to) the measurements of: center of gravity in relation to the hosel, reward center of gravity, MOI, and vertical center of gravity. (If you are curious about this rating system, see more HERE: ralphmaltby.com/362 )
A lot of that info, IMO, should be taken with a grain of salt. However, it’s interesting to note that some iron makers, such as Callaway seem to emphasize putting the ‘sweet spot’ of the blade as close to the center of the club as possible. Some do not seem to give that much consideration… such as Mizuno.
So I’ve come to the conclusion that even though I get heckled, I think a small forging is the way to go. But I would say it would be nice to have something modern only for the newer grooves, lofts, and some help getting the ball airborne. Basically I guess you can say I’ve come full circle, but I really don’t know what my set will be for next year. The debate rages on amongst my peers though. They often throw at me the fact that VERY few of even the PGA’s elite use a pure blade anymore. And some, who’ve been around a while, have been using slight game improvement castings like, Kenny Perry, Fred Funk, etc, etc. If they use clubs like that, should I really use a blade?
I look at this year as a massive learning experience. I guess where maybe I differ from Lag’s opinion is I think there is validity in a small forging that isn’t necessarily a muscle back design.